Archive for the ‘Real Estate in Singapore’ Category

Issues of cost, procedures bubble up in new en bloc rules

Wednesday, April 16th, 2008

Business Times - 12 Apr 2008
 

Fine-tuning and improving the rules revised in October is an ongoing process, says Law Ministry

By KALPANA RASHIWALA

(SINGAPORE) The Ministry of Law is understood to be planning a review soon of the revised en bloc legislation, which took effect on Oct 4 last year. When queried, a MinLaw spokeswoman said: ‘Fine-tuning and improving the legislation is an ongoing process. We will continue to monitor the effect of the changes in practice, and will make further changes, if necessary.’

enbloc.jpg

She added: ‘Since the amended Land Titles (Strata) Act came into effect on Oct 4 last year, we have received feedback in letters from the public and through our service enquiry line. We have also noted the feedback from letters to the press and media articles.

‘The types of feedback received, mainly from affected owners, include welcoming the changes; requests to make the collective sale process even more rigorous by introducing more safeguards; suggestions on how the legislative provisions can be further amended to make the collective sale processes more efficient; and requests for clarification on the amended legislation.’

Property agents and lawyers have told BT that the new rules, while introducing more safeguards and transparency for owners, have made the en bloc process longer, more tedious and increased costs for owners. The total cost (including legal fees) of a collective sale to an owner may have doubled or increased even beyond that.

And with weaker sentiment today and a slimmer chance of success of an en bloc deal materialising, the increasing tendency among property consultants is to pass costs such as development baseline searches upfront to owners, instead of bearing them first and then seeking reimbursement later from sales proceeds as in the past, said Savills Singapore director Steven Ming.

‘Some owners baulk at having to make upfront payments and that may prove to be a stumbling block to en bloc sales,’ he added.

Calling for extraordinary general meetings (EGMs) has also become more troublesome under the new rules. And some agents questioned the need for giving owners a five-day cooling-off period after they have signed the collective sale agreement (CSA) on top of requiring a lawyer to witness signatures. ‘We should have just one or the other,’ said Credo Real Estate managing director Karamjit Singh.

But on a more positive note, Mr Singh added: ‘The requirement for extraordinary general meetings gives owners a clear-cut time schedule of events in any upcoming exercise so they can know what to expect. The new rules also streamline requirements for submitting an application to Strata Titles Board (STB), thereby cutting the advertisement costs payable by the owners. And STB can disregard technical irregularities in the applications if they do not prejudice owners’ interests.’

A chunk of the higher costs of an en bloc sale stems from legal fees.

The fees have at least doubled in some cases to reflect the greater scope of work for lawyers under the new rules, said Lee & Lee partner Ow Yong Thian Soo.

Even before they are appointed, lawyers may have to help owners requisition the first EGM where the sales committee is appointed. After being appointed, lawyers’ additional duties, under the revised rules, include witnessing signatures and updating consent levels every four weeks instead of every eight weeks - with no guarantee that they will secure the 80 per cent minimum consent, or that there will be an eventual sale.

Rodyk & Davidson partner Norman Ho said that as a result, his firm has become more circumspect in accepting new en bloc sale appointments, preferring to choose cases where owners’ expectations are realistic and hence chances of a sale are higher.

‘Generally in the industry, lawyers may have charged about $70-150 per unit for upfront disbursements for doing searches to verify ownership of the units, etc, previously. Today, this may cost anywhere from $250-300. And the professional legal fee, collected upon completion of an en bloc sale, has also increased from about 0.15 to 0.2 per cent of the sale price previously to around 0.3 to 0.4 per cent today.’

Mr Ho added: ‘I know of some firms that are proposing to charge an upfront professional fee of $1,000 to $2,000 per unit, which will be offset from the final fee of say 0.4 per cent, if there is a successful sale.’

Property consultants’ fees is also understood to have also increased by about 50 to 60 per cent because of more work, longer gestation period and more meetings.

Also, owners will now have to cough up the cost of a mandatory land valuation, typically about $5,000 to $25,000 (shared among owners) which has to be submitted at the close of tender. They may also have to be prepared to pay for a development baseline search - which could cost $7,000 to $20,000 - in cases where it may be necessary to ascertain the development baseline to provide certainty in calculating the development charge (DC) payable.

In the past, management corporation funds were sometimes used for such searches, while in other instances, majority owners paid first. In some cases, even property consultants footed the bill initially (but were later reimbursed from sales proceeds) - but that was when the market was buoyant. These days, agents are reluctant to pay upfront for development baseline searches.

Mr Singh suggested that the authorities should make it clear whether the management corporation’s funds may be used for development baseline searches to allow owners to price the asset accurately.

Previously, the sales committee could independently call for EGMs but under new rules, these must be requisitioned by at least 25 per cent of owners, or by owners controlling at least 20 per cent of share values in the development, Rodyk’s Mr Ho said.

However, some property consultants and lawyers said that it is not clear whether the sales committee can still call for general meetings without such requisitions under the new rules - and sought for greater clarity on this issue.

Savills’ Mr Ming said that it is not realistic to expect a lawyer to witness signatures as owners may have questions and ‘it should be very much the agent’s role to persuade them on the merits of the en bloc sale’.

Home prices hold their own, but just barely

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

Business Times - 02 Apr 2008
 

Home prices hold their own, but just barely

Analysts expect at least one quarterly dip this year

By KALPANA RASHIWALA

(SINGAPORE) Despite the quieter market, home prices continued to edge up in the first quarter, although at a slower pace, latest flash estimates show. The quarter-on-quarter rate of increase in the Urban Redevelopment Authority’s price index for private homes decelerated to 4.2 per cent in Q1 this year, after a 6.8 per cent gain in Q4 2007.

price.jpg

Some property consultants are now factoring in declines for at least one of the remaining three quarters of this year, as the full impact of the US economic slowdown bites into the local property market.

URA’s flash estimate also showed that regional sub-indices for non-landed private home prices posted smaller gains all-round in Q1 this year than they did in Q4 2007. However, the 4.8 per cent increase in the Outside Central Region (OCR) in Q1 outpaced gains of 4.4 per cent in the Core Central Region (CCR) and 3.9 per cent in the Rest of Central Region (RCR) - for the first time in four years.

Jones Lang LaSalle said prices are steady in the CCR, supported by deep-pocketed investors, but may be peaking in the RCR, while demand continues to be strong in the OCR as en bloc sellers pick up replacement homes in the suburbs, where prices are relatively more attractive.

In the public housing segment, the Housing & Development Board’s flash estimate shows that the HDB resale flat price index rose 3.4 per cent in Q1 over the preceding quarter, again slower than the 5.7 per cent increase posted in Q4 last year.

Knight Frank director (consultancy and research) Nicholas Mak said that in a worst-case scenario - assuming the Singapore economy contracts in the coming months - URA’s overall price index for private homes could post a full-year increase of zero to 5 per cent.

This factors in one quarter of decline, to the tune of 0.5 to 2.5 per cent, possibly towards the end of the year. Any decline in the index would be the first since Q1 2004, Mr Mak added.

Mr Mak’s best-case scenario is for a 10-15 per cent full-year gain in the index, with increases in all four quarters.

URA’s private home price index rose 31.2 per cent in 2007.

Colliers International’s director for research and consultancy Tay Huey Ying too said that the Singapore property market is likely to experience the full impact of the US economic slowdown by Q3 or Q4 this year.

In a worst-case scenario, URA’s private home price index may rise 8 to 10 per cent for the whole of this year, with possibly a decline in the fourth quarter of not more than 4 per cent, Ms Tay said.

In a best-case scenario - if the US enters a mild recession and recovers by the year-end and Singapore’s GDP growth rate is at the higher end of the MTI’s forecast of 4 to 6 per cent - the full-year increase in URA’s index could be 12-15 per cent.

For the next quarter, CB Richard Ellis is predicting a marginal rise in the index, of about one to 2 per cent from the Q1 level. It estimates that developers sold about 700-1,000 private homes in Q1, less than the 1,449 units they sold in Q4 last year.

Observers said that price gains in the OCR may have come from the secondary market, from completed developments like The Clearwater and Aquarius by the Park in the Bedok Reservoir area. The fact that a new launch in the area, Waterfront Waves, sold for an average price of about $800 psf could have encouraged the trend.

In the western part of Singapore, units sold at The Lakeshore and LakeHolmz in the Boon Lay vicinity may also have helped boost the sub-index for non-landed homes in the OCR, analysts suggest.

Knight Frank’s Mr Mak said that the 4.4 per cent gain in the CCR during Q1 was the lowest rate of increase in the past seven quarters.

As for the HDB resale price index, ERA Singapore assistant vice-president Eugene Lim predicts a full-year increase of not more than 10 per cent, compared with a 17.5 per cent jump in 2007.

Some demand may be taken away from the resale market because of a higher supply of new flats coming onstream, so resale prices may increase at a more measured pace in the coming months.

The HDB said in its release yesterday that the total planned Build-To-Order (BTO) supply of 6,100 new flats for Jan-Sept 2008 will surpass the annual BTO flat supply in 2007 (6,000 units) and 2006 (2,400 units).

HDB’s records show that in February 2008, about a quarter of resale flats were transacted at prices not exceeding $10,000 above market valuation.

Pinetree back with lower en bloc asking price

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

Business Times - 01 Apr 2008
 

Pinetree back with lower en bloc asking price

PINETREE Condominium, which was put up for collective sale in September 2007, has been relaunched at a lower indicative price of about $1,700 per square feet per plot ratio (psf ppr). This is about 20 per cent lower than the previous indicative price of $2,100 psf ppr seven months ago. The indicative asking price now is $128 million.

The property is being marketed by Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL). JLL associate director (investments) David Batchelor said: ‘Market conditions have changed.’ But on the residential collective sales market, he added: ‘I believe there is still interest but the market is more cautious.’

The 41,361 sq ft site at Balmoral Park has a 1.6 plot ratio. JLL said the site has the potential to be redeveloped into a residential development with a gross floor area (GFA) of up to 66,178 sq ft, subject to approval. Mr Batchelor said that currently, Pinetree Condominium is built up to a plot ratio of about 1.816 and added that there is no development charge payable.

The potential developer of the Pinetree site also has the opportunity to combine seven adjoining landed properties to form a total potential land area of 81,303 sq ft, yielding a combined GFA of 130,084 sq ft. This combined total will allow a developer to have a project with 60 to 80 apartment units ranging from 1,500 sq ft to 2,000 sq ft.

Mr Batchelor said the seven landed properties have a total indicative price of about $62 million, bringing the total land price to about $190 million. There is also a development charge of $46 million to $47 million for the landed housing properties.

In March 2006, Pinetree was on the market with an indicative price of around $59 million, or $888 psf ppr.

Makeway View en bloc deal falls through

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

Business Times - 01 Apr 2008 

Development charge higher than expected, says buyer

By KALPANA RASHIWALA

(SINGAPORE) The $162.8 million collective sale of Makeway View in the Newton area to an associate of Bravo Building Construction has been rescinded.

BT understands that the one per cent of purchase price paid by Bravo so far has been forfeited.

A Bravo spokeswoman told BT yesterday that it had earlier sought payment extensions to ascertain the quantum of development charge (DC) payable.

Confirming the move to rescind the sale, she added: ‘We decided not to proceed with the Makeway deal as the actual DC turned out to be higher than what we had been told. So the breakeven price would end up being much higher than what we expected. That’s why my partner (in the proposed acquisition) decided not to proceed further.’ She confirmed that the initial information about the DC did not come from Knight Frank, which was the marketing agent representing the owners of Makeway View.

The $162.8 million deal for Makeway View announced in early November last year, reflected a unit land price of about $1,583 psf ppr including an estimated $21.5 million DC at the time.

Bravo group was one of the biggest buyers of collective sale sites last year, with deals like Tulip Garden for $516 million. Bravo formed separate associate companies for the acquisitions of the various collective sales sites, as the plan was to have different partners for each project.

A Bravo associate has so far paid the initial 5 per cent deposit on Tulip Garden, amounting to about $25 million.

Tulip Garden’s collective sale was approved by STB in late February and the Bravo associate was supposed to have made the second 5 per cent payment shortly after that. However, it requested for an extension on this till early April.

Bravo’s spokeswoman said her company is seeking a further extension to early June to pay this sum and to also extend the completion deadline for the deal from late May currently to early August.

‘We need time to sort out an agreement with our partner and at the same time, sort out the financing arrangement.’

Tulip Garden’s owners are expected to meet this weekend to decide whether to give the payment extensions. Tulip Garden’s price works out to $1,018 psf per plot ratio price (no DC is payable).

Two en bloc sales delayed; developer asks for more time

Tuesday, April 1st, 2008
April 1, 2008
Bravo’s deals involve Tulip Garden for $516m and Pender Court for $80m
By Joyce Teo
A SMALL property firm that snapped up enough sites to place it among the top en bloc players last year has put off completing two deals while it ties up funding.

Because of the delays, owners at one condo are still waiting to pick up cheques for well over $1 million each. They expected payment in late February but an extension put this back to March and now the due date is late this month.

The payments are pending from Bravo Building Construction, a relatively new firm on the property scene. It bought freehold Pender Court condominium in the Telok Blangah area for $80 million last July and soon after purchased Tulip Garden near Holland Road - also freehold - for $516 million.

But completion of both deals seems to have stalled.

Completion is at the final stage of the sale process and triggers the final payment - usually around 95 per cent of the purchase price - to owners. The remaining 5 per cent is paid when the owner vacates.

These headaches for the owners come amid a slowing market for collective sales. The first quarter this year saw just one relatively small deal, compared with some 25 notched up in the same period last year.

The Tulip Garden transaction is expected to be completed late next month but Bravo has already asked for two postponements - first to July 23 and then Aug 7.

It has also asked for extensions to pay an additional 5 per cent of the purchase price - $25.8 million.

This is a routine payment required once the Strata Titles Board approves a sale. An initial 5 per cent deposit was paid when the sale was done.

The deadline for the second 5 per cent payment was March 13 but Bravo won approval to move it to April 7. Then in mid-March, it again asked to move the date, this time to May 5.

However, before the sale committee could respond to the request, it is understood that Bravo asked again to have the date moved even further back, to June 7.

Tulip Garden sold for about $1,018 per sq ft. It has 164 units comprising 96 flats, 66 maisonettes and two shophouses. Flat owners stand to reap $2.5 million to $4.2 million while maisonette owners will receive about $3.4 million each. The shop units will get about $1.1 million each.

The owners are meeting this weekend to consider Bravo’s requests that the completion date be pushed back to Aug 7 and the deadline for the $25.8 million payment be extended to June 7.

The Pender Court deal is even further behind schedule.

Bravo was supposed to have completed the sale on Feb 25 but had it postponed, initially to around mid-March. It then asked for a further extension to April 24, which has apparently been granted.

Pender Court’s 48 owners should each get $1.6 million or so for their flats, which sold for about $872 psf.

Sources have told The Straits Times that they understand Bravo is committed to completing the two purchases and just needs more time to arrange funding.

Bravo, which was registered in 2002, reportedly picked up $824.5 million worth of en bloc sale deals last year, making it the fourth-largest buyer of en bloc sites.

Bravo’s directors could not be reached for comment, despite numerous telephone calls and a visit to its office in an industrial building in Geylang Road last Friday. A Bravo staff member said that the company directors were away on business.

joyceteo@sph.com.sg

Landmark Tower goes en bloc again, at lower price tag

Saturday, March 29th, 2008

Business Times - 26 Mar 2008

LANDMARK Tower, a 99-year leasehold residential site in Chin Swee Road, is up for collective sale again - this time with a lower asking price.

lt.jpg

The property was first put on the market in July last year with an indicative price of about $300 million - but there were no takers.

That price worked out to $1,471 per sq ft per plot ratio (psf ppr), including a charge to top up the site’s remaining tenure to 99 years.

This time, the sellers are asking $270 million, which works out to $1,324 psf ppr, including a $28 million charge to top up the tenure.

No development charge is payable.

The 60,821 sq ft site has a 3.7 plot ratio that would give a developer a total gross floor area of 225,038 sq ft to play with.

‘The successful buyer can redevelop the site to accommodate a high-rise condominium development comprising 220 apartment units of about 1,000 sq ft each,’ said Ho Eng Joo, executive director of investment sales at Colliers International, which is conducting a public tender for the project.

‘With the recent success seen for the sale of state land, we are optimistic that this site - given its strategic location - will be highly attractive to developers and investors who are looking to secure a prime site on the fringe of the central business district,’ he said.

If the asking price is met, owners will get an en-bloc premium of about 70 per cent, Mr Ho said.

Landmark Tower is now a 38-storey residential development comprising 139 apartment and penthouse units.

The tender closes on April 15 at 3pm.

MCL tops bids at $213.5m for Yishun 99-yr condo site

Saturday, March 29th, 2008

Business Times - 26 Mar 2008  

Offer of $350 psf per plot ratio is 68% above the next highest bid

By KALPANA RASHIWALA

MCL Land yesterday offered almost 70 per cent more than its closest rival in a state tender for a 99-year condominium site at Yishun fronting Lower Seletar Reservoir and close to Singapore Orchid Country Club/Golf Course.

The Hongkong Land subsidiary placed the highest of five bids the site drew. Its price of $213.5 million - or about $350 per sq ft of potential gross floor area - was 68 per cent higher than the next highest offer, of $127 million or $208 psf per plot ratio by Peak Properties unit Peak Green. Peak Properties is controlled by the Wee family.

The tender drew three other bids - from Frasers Centrepoint ($109.66 million or $180 psf ppr), Sim Lian Land ($92.6 million or $152 psf ppr), and Cheung Kong Holdings unit Billion Rise, which placed what some market watchers termed a cheeky bid of $57.74 million or just $95 psf ppr.

Asked how he felt about offering such a steep premium for the plot, MCL Land’s CEO Koh Teck Chuan said: ‘I bid at a price I’m comfortable with. I’m confident of making money on this project.’

The breakeven cost for a new condo development on the site will be about $680 psf, and MCL Land’s bid model assumed an average selling price of $750-800 psf, he added.

The group plans a 480-500 unit condo development 15-16 storeys high. ‘Because the site has a long frontage along the reservoir, we can design the project in such a way that almost every unit will face the reservoir,’ Mr Koh said. ‘We’ve studied the site. I climbed up the nearest HDB block and the view was breath-taking. I saw unobstructed views of the reservoir and greenery.

‘And the site is within walking distance of Khatib MRT Station. This is a nice suburban housing location.’

Mr Koh pointed out that developers have adopted divergent strategies at state tenders lately. ‘Some are using the current lull to fish for bargains, while those who need to replenish their landbanks tend to bid at closer to market prices,’ he said.

MCL currently does not have any 99-year leasehold residential sites in its landbank, although it has a string of freehold residential projects it hopes to launch this year or next year. These are in locations like Holland Hill (in a joint venture with Ho Bee), Balmeg Hill in the Pasir Panjang area, Upper Serangoon Road, Boon Teck Road in the Balestier vicinity, Ewe Boon Road, Sixth Avenue and Seletar Hills.

CB Richard Ellis executive director Li Hiaw Ho said the ‘fairly robust response’ of five bids at yesterday’s tender from major and mid-size developers signals ‘developers’ confidence in the suburban segment despite the current lukewarm response to new projects’.

Demand for the new condo on the plot at Yishun Avenue 1/2 is likely to come from HDB upgraders and those working in the northern part of Singapore, he added.